Filters








300 Hits in 5.4 sec

A Glance at the Activity of Iranian Researchers and Reviewers in Publons

Fereshteh Nojavan, Amir Ghasemian, Amir Reza Asnafi, Mohammad Javad Zarei Morad Haseli
2022 DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology  
Publons is a portal that gives information on scientific products, review activities, and the scientometric standing of researchers.  ...  In this applied research, the 10 best institutions of Iran were picked as the comprehensive research based on the number of researchers in Publons.  ...  FINDINGs 5.1 How is Iran's Overall Review Activity in Publons?  ... 
doi:10.14429/djlit.42.4.17728 fatcat:q7bxxcpbevespm2uekjc43ybc4

Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author's Perspective

Ivana Drvenica, Giangiacomo Bravo, Lucija Vejmelka, Aleksandar Dekanski, Olgica Nedić
2018 Publications  
The aim of this study was to investigate the opinion of authors on the overall quality and effectiveness of reviewers' contributions to reviewed papers.  ...  We employed an on-line survey of thirteen journals which publish articles in the field of life, social or technological sciences.  ...  Recently, the Publons website [10] investigated several aspects of reviewer activity.  ... 
doi:10.3390/publications7010001 fatcat:34rrp6snibgtdhk36oykknqcgi

Journal Impact Factor and Peer Review Thoroughness and Helpfulness: A Supervised Machine Learning Study [article]

Anna Severin, Michaela Strinzel, Matthias Egger, Tiago Barros, Alexander Sokolov, Julia Vilstrup Mouatt, Stefan Müller
2022 arXiv   pre-print
Differences were modest and variability high, indicating that the JIF is a bad predictor for the quality of peer review of an individual manuscript.  ...  For thoroughness, sentences on 'Materials and Methods' were more common in the highest JIF journals than in the lowest JIF group (difference of 7.8 percentage points; 95% CI 4.9 to 10.7%).  ...  Acknowledgements We are grateful to Anne Jorstad from the data team of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.  ... 
arXiv:2207.09821v2 fatcat:o53kdnkuhfcvxhf3lfu4t2xszu

Peer Review in Academia [chapter]

Eva Forsberg, Lars Geschwind, Sara Levander, Wieland Wermke
2022 Peer review in an Era of Evaluation  
This is followed by an introduction of some key themes regarding the practices of peer review. Next, we specify some reasons to further explore different practices of peer review.  ...  AbstractIn this chapter, we outline the notion of peer review and its relation to the autonomy of the academic profession and the contract between science and society.  ...  However, investigations like the Wiley study (Warne, 2016) and Publons' (2018) Global State of Peer Review (2018), both focused on reviews of manuscripts, implicate the widespread and increasing use  ... 
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75263-7_1 fatcat:qkfilnmm3bbmtbgdo5so7lzv4u

Types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review based on the literature and surgeons' opinions via Twitter: a narrative review

Sameh Hany Emile, Hytham K. S. Hamid, Semra Demirli Atici, Doga Nur Kosker, Mario Virgilio Papa, Hossam Elfeki, Chee Yang Tan, Alaa El-Hussuna, Steven D. Wexner
2022 Science Editing  
This review aimed to illustrate the types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review (PR) based on a literature review together with the opinions of a social media audience via Twitter.  ...  who are actively engaged in the current PR system.  ...  Acknowledgments We would like to thank Mr Neil Smart, Consultant Colorectal Surgeon and editor-in-chief of Colorectal Disease, for his comments and remarks on the final draft of this manuscript.  ... 
doi:10.6087/kcse.257 fatcat:br2y557p4bexdoxpwvr7c33nqa

Deliverable D7.2 – Completed Policy review and mapping and field research activities

Michela Vignoli, Eleni Toli, Birgit Schmidt, Daniela Luzi, Peter Kraker, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Saskia Woutersen-Windhouwer, Mappet Walker
2019 Zenodo  
The review particularly focuses on policies and initiatives in areas of open peer review, innovative dissemination, altmetrics as well as issues related to gender equality in research and academia.  ...  This report reviews and maps European policies relating to Open Science in order to identify areas where OpenUP's findings and recommendations could support policy-makers and other stakeholders promoting  ...  OpenUP -7107220 Deliverable_D7.2_Completed Policy review and mapping and field research activities  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.2557449 fatcat:zc2jzkjghbgltchuxvtxjperni

Deliverable D3.4 – Open Peer Review: Good practices and lessons learned

Edit Görögh, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Birgit Schmidt, Alessia Bardi, Vittore Casarosa, Paolo Manghi, Oliver Zendel, Daniela Luzi, Roberta Ruggieri
2019 Zenodo  
The results of this study contribute to the guidelines and recommendations the project prepares for decision makers on the implementation of alternative peer review methodologies.  ...  Besides providing an overview of peer review alternatives, the main purpose of the present study is to identify the missing elements and the challenges researchers face in the publishing and evaluation  ...  Based on the advice of an expert panel of researchers, who not only have a wide experience of reviewing for numerous journals, but also sat on editorial boards, Publons put together an easy to follow 12  ... 
doi:10.5281/zenodo.2557308 fatcat:otdlgem35vgn3keh4u3zddjn2u

Impact of smoking behavior on clozapine blood levels – a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Elias Wagner, Laura McMahon, Peter Falkai, Alkomiet Hasan, Dan Siskind
2020 Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica  
By investigating differences in clozapine blood levels in smoking and non-smoking patients on clozapine, we aim to provide guidance for clinicians how to adjust clozapine levels for patients on clozapine  ...  Data from 23 studies were included in this meta-analysis with 21 investigating differences between clozapine blood levels of smokers and non-smokers.  ...  Methods The methods are based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (20) .  ... 
doi:10.1111/acps.13228 pmid:32869278 fatcat:c7o5yicrlbbshgkcbfalct25gi

Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts

Gary S McDowell, John D Knutsen, June M Graham, Sarah K Oelker, Rebeccah S Lijek
2019 eLife  
Here we report the results of a literature review and a survey of researchers, with an emphasis on co-reviewing and 'ghostwriting'.  ...  activity is anecdotal.  ...  Institutions where peer review training takes place Sources mentioned two primary institutions where training in peer review may take place.  ... 
doi:10.7554/elife.48425 pmid:31668163 pmcid:PMC6822987 fatcat:dhrr2ntvuze7hp3hxgwo2zlate

Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts [article]

Gary S McDowell, John Knutsen, June Graham, Sarah K Oelker, Rebeccah S Lijek
2019 bioRxiv   pre-print
Co-reviewing is the second most commonly reported form of training in peer review besides receiving reviews on one′s own papers.  ...  The goal of this study is to shed light on the involvement of early career researchers (ECRs) during peer review of manuscripts for publication in journals.  ...  Jessica Polka, Adriana Bankston, Carrie Niziolek, and Chris Pickett for their constructive comments on this manuscript.  ... 
doi:10.1101/617373 fatcat:uathlewatfgvpp6d4tqirhxxdi

Factors influencing acceptance or rejection by Iranian medical researchers of invitations to peer review

Maryam Talei, Farhad Handjani, Behrooz Astaneh, Mehrdad Askarian, Peyman Jafari
2021 European Science Editing  
The data included the reviewers’ demographics, history of their reviews, and choice of 11 reasons each for accepting or declining the invitation to review.  ...  in Iran to serve as peer reviewers.  ...  an honorarium for reviewing, based on the number of articles reviewed and the time spent on the task.  ... 
doi:10.3897/ese.2021.e62836 fatcat:yneg3zh35vhxlbxy32ggwoqcua

Social Networks as an Alternative Environment for the Implementation of Scientific Communication

Alina Petrushka, Maria Komova, Ivan Demydov
2019 International Workshop on Control, Optimisation and Analytical Processing of Social Networks  
Social scientific networks were analyzed on the subject of completeness of providing various aspects of scientific activity: satisfaction of information needs of a scientist, establishment of scientific  ...  communication, promotion of scientific results, library and bibliographic support of the scientific activity and evaluation of scientific results.  ...  Differences in the methodology of data collection in social media, which may have an influence on the analytical use of altmetric data, are investigated.  ... 
dblp:conf/coapsn/PetrushkaKD19 fatcat:iozmfcfvqvanvbjqliwgmx3bou

Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review

Travis G Gerwing, Alyssa M Allen Gerwing, Chi-Yeung Choi, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Jeff C Clements, Joshua A Rash
2021 Research Integrity and Peer Review  
Our recent paper ( https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x ) reported that 43% of reviewer comment sets (n=1491) shared with authors contained at least one unprofessional comment or an incomplete, inaccurate  ...  Publication of this work sparked an online (i.e., Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Reddit) conversation surrounding professionalism in peer review.  ...  Acknowledgements We would like to thank social media commenters and peer reviewers who engage in a professional manner. The authors would also like to thank Dr.  ... 
doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00107-x pmid:33588947 fatcat:lrw6bh62wnd4pp3ihtociolake

Which Are the Tools Available for Scholars? A Review of Assisting Software for Authors during Peer Reviewing Process

J. Israel Martínez-López, Samantha Barrón-González, Alejandro Martínez López
2019 Publications  
There is a large amount of Information Technology and Communication (ITC) tools that surround scholar activity.  ...  The result of an examination of literature assisted the creation of a novel taxonomy of types of software available in the market.  ...  whose findings are negative (File Drawer problem) [30, 31] and prejudices developed ad hominem (based on race, gender, or socio-political affiliations).  ... 
doi:10.3390/publications7030059 fatcat:bahqf36plngidlbqsg3ibptzme

Peer review in practice [chapter]

2017 BOOC  
Efficiency Hybrid Peer Review Based on US Law journals, introduce an element of competition by allowing authors to submit to multiple journals at once (Mendenhall) .  ...  Review in Practice', notes the variety of approaches and classifications, explaining key differences between review models, and illustrating varying levels of support for peer review among contemporary  ... 
doi:10.14324/111.9781911307679.15 fatcat:3vspqukcjnffjjpwzrkpbiotmq
« Previous Showing results 1 — 15 out of 300 results