Filters








127 Hits in 5.9 sec

Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research

Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels
2011 Argumentation: an international journal on reasoning  
involves and discuss the fallacies in terms of the extended pragma-dialectical approach as derailments of strategic maneuvering.  ...  Then they give an empirical interpretation of the extended pragma-dialectical model in which they report the testing of three hypotheses which formulate preliminary conditions for effectiveness research  ...  of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.  ... 
doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9234-7 fatcat:vs7bmcq4ibaklglctildia7mp4

The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted [chapter]

Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels
2012 Argumentation Library  
The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted van Eemeren, F.H.; Garssen, B.J.; Meuffels, H.L.M.  ...  In contradistinction, the conventional validity of these rules can only be established by means of empirical research.  ...  Expressed differently: the aim of this ten-year project was to investigate and to test the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules: can it be expected that in actual discussion  ... 
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_21 fatcat:iaaxwqnusbdznnuuvmnx3fk4ve

The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted [chapter]

Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels
2015 Argumentation Library  
The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted van Eemeren, F.H.; Garssen, B.J.; Meuffels, H.L.M.  ...  In contradistinction, the conventional validity of these rules can only be established by means of empirical research.  ...  Expressed differently: the aim of this ten-year project was to investigate and to test the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules: can it be expected that in actual discussion  ... 
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_41 fatcat:df37wvy6zfdhbfrlq2lz3qm2ju

Review of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

David H. Zarefsky
2020 Informal Logic  
This article reviews Frans H. van Eemeren's Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective (Springer 2018).  ...  Some are clearly normative and prescriptive, setting forth rules for the proper conduct of a critical discussion.  ...  One reason for the popularity of pragma-dialectics, I suspect, is that it can envelop alternative approaches.  ... 
doi:10.22329/il.v40i1.6159 fatcat:oblheboctnbudnltrwdpchnasy

Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics

Frans H. van Eemeren
2015 Argumentation: an international journal on reasoning  
It situates the studies of argumentative patterns reported in these papers in the pragma-dialectical research program.  ...  The description of the theoretical innovations that are introduced and the exposition of their relationship with the standard and extended pragma-dialectical theory create a conceptual and terminological  ...  This resulted in the monograph Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness (van Eemeren et al. 2009 ).  ... 
doi:10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z fatcat:vsw2gg7kava55dnanxrqu5frju

Preface: From Pragmatics and Dialectics to Argument Studies

Katarzyna Budzynska, Frans H. van Eemeren, Marcin Koszowy
2014 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric  
This special issue explores some of the fascinating research questions which emerge when we move beyond logic into the territory of the pragmatics and dialectics of argument.  ...  Pragmatics and dialectics are two disciplines which have been amongst the first and most important partners for argument studies in the exploration of the complex realm of communication.  ...  and Bert Meuffels were reported in Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness (2009).  ... 
doi:10.2478/slgr-2014-0014 fatcat:tfycnp4e7nfbjcirtacbaafgmq

Strategic Manoeuvring and the Selection of Starting Points in the Pragma-Dialectical Framework

Gábor Forgács
2014 Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric  
In the final part of the paper I argue that the problems raised can be dealt with within the framework of pragma-dialectics.  ...  I would like to show that resolution of the difference of opinion requires the resolution of a subordinate difference of opinion concerning how to label her medical state, and why discussants were not  ...  It gives a brief summary of the framework of pragma-dialectics on the one hand, and discusses the treatment of fallacies in the pragma-dialectical framework in general, as well as the treatment of arguments  ... 
doi:10.2478/slgr-2014-0013 fatcat:pd4d22osqbb6zmf5myrtnrfuti

The Contextuality of Fallacies

Frans H. Van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser
2008 Informal Logic  
Then they discuss Walton's contextual analysis of fallacies as illegitimate dialectical shifts of dialogue types and offer an alternative in which both the empirical and the normative dimension are given  ...  notion such as the model of a critical discussion.  ...  but their concept of a critical discussion is different from the pragma-dialectical concept and lacks the special function the concept has in the pragma-dialectical theorizing. 7 The concept of a critical  ... 
doi:10.22329/il.v27i1.464 fatcat:wqxzikqx4fay3hqrtvpfs2z3bi

Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness [chapter]

Frans H. van Eemeren
2009 Rhetoric and argumentation in the beginning of the XXIst century: proceedings of the XXIst century  
Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness Autor(es): Eemeren, Frans H. van Publicado por: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra  ...  In principle, each of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules constitutes a distinct norm for critical discussion.  ...  to the dialectical objective of the discussion stage concerned.  ... 
doi:10.14195/978-989-26-0498-5_3 fatcat:draaafywunffbb5x63fsjys4km

Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation

Eddo Rigotti
2011 Argumentation: an international journal on reasoning  
Among the most urgent challenges at the five fundamental levels of pragma-dialectical research program (philosophical, theoretical, empirical, analytical and practical) I limit myself to mentioning, regarding  ...  The integration of strategic maneuvering does not twist the pragma-dialectical approach as its fundamental concept and value-namely reasonableness-with the dialectical rules entailed by it, which are aimed  ... 
doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9202-2 fatcat:6aswv53rtreifcxqn42my6rlei

Advances in Pragma-Dialectics

David Hitchcock
2004 Informal Logic  
Pragma-dialectics is the approach to the study of argumentation developed by Frans van Eemeren and the late Rob Grootendorst of the department of speech communication, argumentation theory and rhetoric  ...  discussion, with the author anticipating the responses of a rational critic  ...  I am of course responsible for any flaws in this version, and indeed Houtlosser disagrees with some of my positions expressed above.  ... 
doi:10.22329/il.v23i1.2156 fatcat:tctdip72b5d35jnqofcefrujzq

The Disguised ad baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated. Strategic Maneuvering with Threats [chapter]

Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels
2015 Argumentation Library  
held responsible for the occurrence of the unpleasant consequences if he does not get his way.  ...  Ad baculum threats can be seen as a mode of strategic maneuvering which takes on a reasonable appearance in real life situations when it mimics, legitimate pragmatic argumentation.  ...  Based on the consistent results of a 13 year-lasting, comprehensive empirical research project concerning the judgments of ordinary arguers of the reasonableness of fallacious and non-fallacious discussion  ... 
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_44 fatcat:6dkqok5o2rdprmicqfr4pfdnwa

In Context

Frans H. van Eemeren
2011 Argumentation: an international journal on reasoning  
critical discussion in the activity type concerned.  ...  the identification of fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering.  ...  Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided  ... 
doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9211-1 fatcat:2hlddyx74vfwtpqwjrvswojkry

Page 4612 of Psychological Abstracts Vol. 79, Issue 11 [page]

1992 Psychological Abstracts  
It is shown that the verbal moves that are traditionally known as fallacies can be regarded as specific violations of the rules for critical discussion.  ...  together pragmatic insight concerning speech acts and dialectical insight concerning critical discus- sion.  ... 

Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship

Frans H. Van Eemeren
2017 Informal Logic  
To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-dialectical theory as it widened its scope, step by step, from an abstract model of critical discussion  ...  This means that they can now start answering the crucial question about the typical characteristics of their discourse asked by interested lawyers, politicians, academics and other practitioners of argumentation  ...  Figure 2 From standard to extended pragma-dialectics Our second step in establishing the connection between the theory and argumentative reality involved empirical research concerning the function of argumentative  ... 
doi:10.22329/il.v37i4.5002 fatcat:oorq3mfhmnchpe5aekgk7y34ve
« Previous Showing results 1 — 15 out of 127 results