A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf
.
Filters
Single- versus double-blind reviewing
2006
SIGMOD record
"In summary, the literature on single-blind versus double-blind reviewing spans a wide variety of disciplines and provides rather mixed results. ...
The present paper will use the terms single-blind and double-blind reviewing, as well as their respective threeletter acronyms, SBR and DBR. ...
doi:10.1145/1168092.1168094
fatcat:norp623oxrabnaipstvmvnrt4q
Single versus Double Blind Reviewing at WSDM 2017
[article]
2017
arXiv
pre-print
In this paper we study the implications for conference program committees of using single-blind reviewing, in which committee members are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, versus double-blind ...
Once papers were allocated to reviewers, single-blind reviewers were significantly more likely than their double-blind counterparts to recommend for acceptance papers from famous authors and top institutions ...
Over several years, 1498 papers were randomly assigned to single-blind versus double-blind reviewing condition. ...
arXiv:1702.00502v6
fatcat:zpgpk72ukjcfnew5tesjo3dpxa
Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
2017
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Peer review may be "single-blind," in which reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of paper authors, or "double-blind," in which this information is hidden. ...
Once papers are allocated to reviewers, single-blind reviewers are significantly more likely than their double-blind counterparts to recommend for acceptance papers from famous authors, top universities ...
We allocate exactly two double-blind reviewers and two single-blind reviewers to each paper, from a total pool of 974 double-blind and 983 single-blind reviewers. ...
doi:10.1073/pnas.1707323114
pmid:29138317
pmcid:PMC5715744
fatcat:s4zuulxrsjb6tjlbzwlvdpyvy4
Editorial
2007
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
This editorial analyzes from a variety of perspectives the controversial issue of single-blind versus double-blind reviewing. ...
We explore the "knobs" a policy design can manipulate to fine-tune a double-blind review policy. This editorial ends with a specific decision. ...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The instructions to authors and reviewers given in the Appendix are based on instructions given to SIGMOD'06 authors. ...
doi:10.1145/1206049.1206050
fatcat:nvqwew4wzrf3bbiev2l2zz54ny
Editorials
2014
Indian Pediatrics
On the contrary, Yung, et al. [11] in their double-blind randomized controlled trial concluded ...
The incidence of hyponatremia in the hypotonic versus isotonic saline group was 70% and 33.3%, respectively, thus echoing the previous observations on this issue. ...
[11] in their double-blind randomized controlled trial concluded VOLUME 51 __ DECEMBER 15, 2014 EDITORIALS that fluid type rather than rate had a greater effect on sodium concentration even though the ...
doi:10.1007/s13312-014-0541-6
pmid:25560152
fatcat:jrqewvd57zck3jltrpprwmpqfi
Guest editorial
2006
Journal of Brand Management
The papers were all subjected to a double-blind peer review process, and authors were required to modify their initial submissions. ...
The first issue (single brand versus corporate brand) arises continually approach (which is more aligned to corporate brands) than the 'single place single brand approach' (which is primarily the focus ...
doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540267
fatcat:wntstafa5jh65ct6pgxceusebm
Guest editorial
2018
Qualitative Market Research
Management of the paper by Crick (JM) was via the Guest Editor and followed a double blind review process. ...
The Editor-in-Chief assigned referees under a double blind review process and accepted the paper after the authors addressed comments from those referees. 2. ...
doi:10.1108/qmr-12-2017-0162
fatcat:52nybskflbh7batgbluwnaamxu
Editorial
2015
Indian Pediatrics
A recent randomized double-blind placebocontrolled study [11] established the efficacy and safety of Drotaverine hydrochloride in Indian adults with irritable bowel syndrome. ...
A Cochrane review [4] published the efficacy of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Pizotifen versus placebo, peppermint oil capsules with placebo, and Famotidine with placebo. ...
doi:10.1007/s13312-015-0729-4
pmid:26499004
fatcat:vzenz6lejjgchmy3bped4pxcim
Editorial
2005
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
Further validation of double FM in praxis is achieved by a hardware demonstrator. ...
The proposed method applies blind multiuser channel estimation on the basis of first-and second-order statistics of received signals. ...
doi:10.1155/asp.2005.249
fatcat:tcq4wniqdjdufh3jzbvdt4utfi
Editorial Comment on: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Antimuscarinic Drugs for Overactive Bladder
2008
European Urology
Ocular side-effects of tolterodine and oxybu- Japanese patients with overactive bladder treated with tynin, a single-blind prospective randomized trial. ...
Editorial Comment on: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Antimuscarinic Drugs for Overactive Bladder Rufus Cartwright Department of Urogynaecology, King's College ...
doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.081
pmid:18632200
fatcat:h5zfdgol5zas5ha4q63qzzmpay
Editorial Review: Therapeutic Trials in Multiple Sclerosis
1984
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
double
double
double
single
5
/i7 HBO treated improved.
2.5
No benefit. ...
y
14-RP.5-CP)
29(21-RR,x /
8-CPL^29(20-RR, 9-CP)
14-RR
13-RR
+
+
double
double
double
double
0.25
0.5
0.3-1.2
0.8
0.75-30
0.25
1
1
double
2
double
1
Vi deteriorated ...
doi:10.1017/s0317167100045704
fatcat:5myllz67rje43pzmb35mhky7fi
Editorial: Developments in biogeography
2013
Journal of Biogeography
Some have argued that the single-blind review model is likely to be biased, for example, against female authors. ...
First, the Journal of Biogeography is currently operating a single-blind peer review model within which we strive to avoid the use of conflicted reviewers. ...
doi:10.1111/jbi.12242
fatcat:umy2rewiq5cdffs7aqlgipoc3a
Editorial
2014
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Morbidity was 38% in the Ultracision group versus 60.5% in the control group (p=0.059). ...
Medical records were reviewed for demographic/clinical information, surgical details and pathologic results. ...
This single institution retrospective review investigates single agent trabectedin activity in BRCA associated HGSOC. ...
doi:10.1097/igc.0000000000000061
pmid:24356409
fatcat:l2gj6y7ddzdqvhqp3gbredy3w4
Editorial
2002
Diabetic Medicine
Double dummy blinding of the two study treatments was used. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. ...
Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to
double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker
or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention
as a Goal in ...
A structured abstract of the highest-ranking article is prepared,
Citation For citation purposes, each issue will be regarded as a single article; citations should be in the following format: Continuing ...
doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.19.s5.1.x
pmid:12207797
fatcat:43tudrp6enhbhhpqxmrqxwsgv4
What are innovations in peer review and editorial assessment for?
2020
Genome Biology
'Double blind' reviews (or even 'triple blind', if author and reviewer identities are anonymised to editors) are expected to encourage reviewers and editors to focus on content, rather than to be influenced ...
For example, whether single or double blind is 'better' is not just a matter of whether more errors are filtered out, but also of fairness (gender, institutional address), of whether the more significant ...
doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02004-4
pmid:32362286
fatcat:teviqexgzzcppjwkirnmmpgmt4
« Previous
Showing results 1 — 15 out of 18,186 results