Anisotropic Finite Element Mesh Adaptation via Higher Dimensional Embedding release_xj2lwp7h7zhdjnk5ga6ixsgrny

by Franco Dassi, Hang Si, Simona Perotto, Timo Streckenbach, Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB)

Published by Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier.

2022  

Abstract

In this paper we provide a novel anisotropic mesh adaptation technique for adaptive finite element analysis. It is based on the concept of higher dimensional embedding, which was exploited in [1], [2], [3], [4] to obtain an anisotropic curvature adapted mesh that fits a complex surface in R3. In the context of adaptive finite element simulation, the solution (which is an unknown function f : Ω ⊂ d → ) is sought by iteratively modifying a finite element mesh according to a mesh sizing field described via a (discrete) metric tensor field that is typically obtained through an error estimator. We proposed to use a higher dimensional embedding, Φf (x):= (x1, …, xd, s f (x1, …, xd), s ▿ f (x1, …, xd))t, instead of the mesh sizing field for the mesh adaption. This embedding contains both informations of the function f itself and its gradient. An isotropic mesh in this embedded space will correspond to an anisotropic mesh in the actual space, where the mesh elements are stretched and aligned according to the features of the function f. To better capture the anisotropy and gradation of the mesh, it is necessary to balance the contribution of the components in this embedding. We have properly adjusted Φf (x) for adaptive finite element analysis. To better understand and validate the proposed mesh adaptation strategy, we first provide a series of experimental tests for piecewise linear interpolation of known functions. We then applied this approach in an adaptive finite element solution of partial differential equations. Both tests are performed on two-dimensional domains in which adaptive triangular meshes are generated. We compared these results with the ones obtained by the software BAMG – a metric-based adaptive mesh generator. The errors measured in the L2 norm are comparable. Moreover, our meshes captured the anisotropy more accurately than the meshes of BAMG.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   8.2 MB
file_f6vajd5y5nhnxcj4kiuv3f66du
oa.tib.eu (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2022-07-06
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 7b3eeb22-8852-4ad3-aa51-0482e114bcb1
API URL: JSON