Potentially inappropriate prescriptions according to explicit and implicit criteria in patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. MULTIPAP: A cross-sectional study release_u4pq522zcrhgtbdei3dcd6uvqi

by Juan A. Lopez-Rodriguez, maria eloisa rogero blanco, Mercedes Aza-Pascual-Salcedo, Fernando López Verde, Victoria Pico-Soler, Leiva-Fernández F, Daniel Prados Torres, Alexandra Prados-Torres, Isabel Cura-González, MULTIPAP group

Published in PLoS ONE by Public Library of Science (PLoS).

2020   Volume 15, Issue 8, e0237186

Abstract

Multimorbidity is a global health challenge that is associated with polypharmacy, increasing the risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). There are tools to improve prescription, such as implicit and explicit criteria. To estimate the prevalence of PIP in a population aged 65 to 74 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, according to American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® (2015, 2019), the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescription -STOPP- criteria (2008, 2014), and the Medication Appropriateness Index -MAI- criteria in primary care. This was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. The sample included 593 community-dwelling elderly aged 65 to 74 years, with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, who participated in the MULTIPAP trial. Socio-demographic, clinical, professional, and pharmacological-treatment variables were recorded. Potentially inappropriate prescribing was detected by computerized prescription assistance system, and family doctors evaluated the MAI. The MAI-associated factors were analysed using a logistic regression model. A total of 4,386 prescriptions were evaluated. The mean number of drugs was 7.4 (2.4 SD). A total of 94.1% of the patients in the study had at least one criterion for drug inappropriateness according to the MAI. Potentially inappropriate prescribing was detected in 57.7%, 43.6%, 68.8% and 71% of 50 patients according to the explicit criteria STOPP 2014, STOPP 2008, Beers 2019 and Beers 2015 respectively. For every new drug taken by a patient, the MAI score increased by 2.41 (95% CI 1.46; 3.35) points. Diabetes, ischaemic heart disease and asthma were independently associated with lower summated MAI scores. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing detected in the sample was high and in agreement with previous literature for populations with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The MAI criteria detected greater inappropriateness than did the explicit criteria, but their application was more complex and difficult to automate.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   914.9 kB
file_mysfz6efandkxahu73zrtgqfie
journals.plos.org (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2020-08-12
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
Not in Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  1932-6203
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: a30f5d91-2851-4699-b817-853aa7c6cef5
API URL: JSON