@article{kendrick_peveler_longworth_baldwin_moore_chatwin_thornett_goddard_campbell_smith_et al._2006,
title={Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine},
volume={188},
DOI={10.1192/bjp.188.4.337},
abstractNote={
Background
The cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has not been compared in a prospective study in primary care.
Aims
To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of TCAs, SSRIs and lofepramine in UK primary care.
Method
An open-label, three-arm randomised trial with a preference arm. Practitioners referred 327 patients with incident depression.
Results
No significant differences were found in effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. The numbers of depression-free weeks over 12 months (on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were 25.3 (95% CI 21.3–29.0) for TCAs, 28.3 (95% CI 24.3–32.2) for SSRIs and 24.6 (95% CI 20.6–28.9) for lofepramine. Mean health service costs per patient were $762 (95% CI 553–1059) for TCAs, $875 (95% CI 675–1355) for SSRIs and $867 (95% CI 634–1521) for lofepramine. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested SSRIs were most cost-effective (with a probability of up to 0.6).
Conclusions
The findings support a policy of recommending SSRIs as first-choice antidepressants in primary care.
},
number={04},
publisher={Royal College of Psychiatrists},
author={Kendrick and Peveler and Longworth and Baldwin and Moore and Chatwin and Thornett and Goddard and Campbell and Smith and et al.},
year={2006}
}