Compensation or Competitive Advantage? Reconciling Investment Arbitration with EU State Aid Law release_sd4sfydmcvhp5cevkfbo54tdjm

by Johannes Hendrik Fahner

Published in ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal by Oxford University Press (OUP).

2022   Volume 37, p672-686

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> —International investment law and EU State aid law have clashed on multiple occasions, most famously in the Micula case but also in disputes over subsidies in the renewable energy sector. In the view of the European Commission, investors should not be able to use investment arbitration to obtain compensation for the withdrawal of unlawful State aid, as this would jeopardize the effectiveness of EU State aid law. For this reason, the Commission has intervened in numerous investment arbitrations, arguing that investors cannot have legitimate expectations in respect of State aid that was granted in violation of EU law, and that any compensation awarded by a tribunal in such circumstances would also constitute State aid. This article argues that while EU State aid law should inform an assessment of the investor's legitimate expectations, tribunals need to conduct a comprehensive evaluation that also considers other relevant factors, such as the respondent State's representations and the foreseeability of the State aid qualification. If a tribunal determines that an investor was entitled to legitimate expectations despite EU State aid law, any compensation awarded by the tribunal should be accepted as damages that fall outside the scope of EU State aid law. In this way, a conflict between the two fields of law, which only encourages investors to seek enforcement outside the European Union, can be avoided.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   165.2 kB
file_anksflqnqzbkdp74e7feehsqme
watermark.silverchair.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2022-09-01
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0258-3690
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: cca935b2-85d8-47c8-a5af-c50f5630baf8
API URL: JSON