Demand for Law and the Security of Property Rights: The Case of Post-Soviet Russia release_rw3wvcgwfbahhfd5apufoolfhu

Abstract

Studies of property rights overwhelmingly focus on whether states expropriate or protect property, overlooking the crucial issue of whether private sector actors will <jats:italic>use</jats:italic> state institutions. By contrast, I argue that the "supply" of formal legal institutions often fails to ensure firms will rely on the state for property rights protection. Instead, firms frequently avoid formal legal institutions and turn to illegal strategies based on violence or corruption. Whether firms adopt legal strategies depends on: (1) firm-level practices and beliefs that impede the use of law, (2) the effectiveness of illegal strategies, and (3) coordination problems resulting from firms' expectations about each other's strategies. Drawing on interviews with firms, lawyers, and private security agencies, as well as an original survey of Russian enterprises, I illustrate how "demand-side" factors led to a surprising increase in Russian firms' reliance on formal legal institutions over the past two decades. The findings suggest that comprehensive understanding of property rights and the rule of law requires not only attention to state institutions' effectiveness, but also to private actors' strategies.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations