Reflections about Garfield's algorithm release_ra2bcc5k35egzgyemsckfpnz6u

by Laura Sinay, Maria Cristina Fogliatti de Sinay, Rodney William (Bill) Carter, Aurea Martins

Published in RAUSP Management Journal by Emerald.

2019   Volume ahead-of-print, Issue ahead-of-print

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the influence of the algorithm used on scholarly search engines (Garfield's algorithm) and propose metrics to improve it so that science could be based on a more democratic way. </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> This paper used a snow-ball approach to collect data that allowed identifying the history and the logic behind the Garfield's algorithm. It follows on excerpting the foundation of existing algorithm and databases of major scholarly search engine. It concluded proposing new metrics so as to surpass restraints and to democratize the scientific discourse. </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> This paper finds that the studied algorithm currently biases the scientific discourse toward a narrow perspective, while it should take into consideration several researchers' characteristics. It proposes the substitution of the h-index by the number of times the scholar's most cited work has been cited. Finally, it proposes that works in languages different than English should be included. </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title> The broad comprehension of any phenomena should be based on multiple perspectives; therefore, the inclusion of diverse metrics will extend the scientific discourse. </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> The improvement of the existing algorithm will increase the chances of contact among different cultures, which stimulate rapid progress on the development of knowledge. </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> The value of this paper resides in demonstrating that the algorithm used in scholarly search engines biases the development of science. If updated as proposed here, science will be unbiased and bias aware. </jats:sec>
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   315.4 kB
file_qonel6qaafdi5of5dnhfobsxba
www.emerald.com (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2019-09-19
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  2531-0488
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: fc4b3212-20d6-40d9-a88e-1906fdc47ecb
API URL: JSON