Moist Wound Dressings and Pressure Relieving Surfaces : Mechanisms, Materials and a Review of Some Cost-Effectiveness Findings release_qfygimhix5bsbcywi45tbnd4na

by Duncan Mortimer

Published by Figshare.

2017  

Abstract

This paper is intended to provide background to guide future work in establishing the cost-effectiveness of modern wound care practices. An outline of the rationale, indications and effectiveness is given for two aspects of the total wound care protocol: pressure relief and moist wound dressings. Against this background of mechanisms and materials for wound healing, methodology employed in reported cost-effectiveness studies is appraised with a view to identifying a set of rigorous studies that might accurately reflect the value of adopting alternative wound care methods as part of a standard treatment protocol. Several methodological shortcomings were identified in the studies reviewed. Moreover, these studies generally fell well short of the rigorous application of CEA methods necessary to inform questions of resource allocation at the societal level. Nonetheless, reviewed findings provide a guide to the magnitude of key factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of pressure relieving surfaces and moist wound healing. Further, modelling cost-effectiveness around reviewed findings could well produce robust estimates of C/E suitable to guide resource allocation.
In text/plain format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   918.3 kB
file_vafxyz5cajg4zmoz4mabm5tydy
au-east.erc.monash.edu.au (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2017-06-08
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: f146b3b4-332d-44be-a1c3-449286972ba9
API URL: JSON