Mathematical models help explain experimental data. Response to 'Transcriptional interpretation of Shh morphogen signaling: computational modeling validates empirically established models'

by Michael Cohen, Karen M. Page, Ruben Perez-Carrasco, Chris P. Barnes, James Briscoe

Published in Development by The Company of Biologists.

2016 Volume 143, Issue 10, p1640-1643

application/pdf 393.2 kB `file_xcq7jmxn7nbp5gp7br4otpdofq`
application/pdf 140.6 kB `file_3wftd6soabgldkjohr7d3gn7le`	web.archive.org (webarchive) discovery.ucl.ac.uk (web)

Preserved and Accessible

Type article-journal
Stage

published

Date 2016-05-15
Language en ^?

DOI 10.1242/dev.138461
PubMed 27190033
Wikidata Q50643974

Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L: 0950-1991

Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)

Cite This

BibTeX
CSL-JSON
MLA
Harvard

Lookup Links

oaDOI/unpaywall (OA fulltext)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar

Catalog Record
Revision: c0e281b4-cb9f-4659-b857-62fe83e3a3ba
API URL: JSON

Mathematical models help explain experimental data. Response to 'Transcriptional interpretation of Shh morphogen signaling: computational modeling validates empirically established models' release_pwr6ddbkvrgbjm3mw4qfuyv67e