Meropenem versus Cefuroxime plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Serious Infections in Elderly Patients
release_pt3othemu5hanitffos7vdc7gq
by
C. A. J. J. Jaspers,
H. Kieft,
B. Speelberg,
A. Buiting,
M. van Marwijk Kooij,
G. J. H. M. Ruys,
H. H. Vincent,
M. C. A. Vermeulen,
A. G. Olink,
I. M. Hoepelman
1998 Volume 42, p1233-1238
Abstract
In this multicenter study, the efficacy of and tolerability for meropenem were compared with those for the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (±metronidazole) for the treatment of serious bacterial infections in patients ≥65 years of age. A total of 79 patients were randomized; thirty-nine received meropenem (1 g/8 h), and 40 received cefuroxime (1.5 g/8 h) plus gentamicin (4 mg/kg of body weight daily) for 5 to 10 days. Metronidazole (500 mg/6 h) could be added to the cefuroxime-gentamicin regimen for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10). Seventy patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy; the primary diagnoses were as follows: pneumonia in 41 patients (20 treated with meropenem, 21 treated with cefuroxime-gentamicin), intra-abdominal infection in 10 patients (7 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin-metronidazole), urinary tract infection (UTI) in 11 patients (6 meropenem, 5 cefuroxime-gentamicin), sepsis syndrome in 7 patients (4 meropenem, 3 cefuroxime-gentamicin), and "other" in 1 patient (cefuroxime-gentamicin). The pathogens isolated from 18 patients with bacteremia were as follows:<jats:italic>Staphylococcus</jats:italic> spp. (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2),<jats:italic>Streptococcus</jats:italic> spp. (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2), members of the family <jats:italic>Enterobacteriaceae</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 11), and <jats:italic>Bacteroides</jats:italic> spp. (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 3). A satisfactory clinical response at the end of therapy was achieved in 26 of 37 (70%) and 24 of 33 (73%) evaluable patients treated with meropenem and combination therapy, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 23 of 31 (74%) and 21 of 28 (75%) evaluable patients with infections other than UTIs, respectively. A satisfactory microbiological response occurred in 15 of 22 (68%) patients in the meropenem group compared with 12 of 19 (63%) treated with combination therapy. Renal failure occurred during therapy in 2 of 39 (5%) meropenem recipients compared with 5 of 40 (13%) of those treated with combination therapy. The findings in this small study indicate that meropenem is as efficacious for and as well tolerated by elderly patients as the combination of cefuroxime-gentamicin (±metronidazole).
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf
157.9 kB
file_cusomnkzdnhgpn7lxclqbjfr5m
| |
application/pdf
157.9 kB
file_7bjmkyf3hrawbcguw5agslf6ay
|
web.archive.org (webarchive) aac.asm.org (web) |
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar