Geoffrey Chaucer, Cecily Chaumpaigne, and the Statute of Laborers: New Records and Old Evidence Reconsidered release_m67nvopd6vhlleosuwygdpxmq4

by Euan Roger, Sebastian Sobecki

Published in The Chaucer Review: A Journal of Medieval Studies and Literary Criticism by The Pennsylvania State University Press.

2022   Volume 57, p407-437

Abstract

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> This article introduces two records that clarify the relationship between Geoffrey Chaucer and Cecily Chaumpaigne. The new documents also demonstrate the relevance of a known Chaucer life-record that previously had not been associated with this case. Our findings offer a radically different understanding of the documentary evidence and establish that Chaucer and Chaumpaigne were not opponents but belonged to the same party in a legal dispute with Chaumpaigne's former employer, Thomas Staundon, who had sued them both under the Statute of Laborers. Chaumpaigne's quitclaims for Chaucer offered the most expedient legal path under the Statute of Laborers for both Chaucer and Chaumpaigne to demonstrate that she had left her employment with Staundon voluntarily, as opposed to being coerced or abducted (raptus), before commencing work for Chaucer.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   8.2 MB
file_zlrkodhfljfr3dt4o6ha4iiasy
watermark.silverchair.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2022-10-01
Language   en ?
Journal Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0009-2002
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: f93d6b12-711e-469e-ad54-ace028bdd264
API URL: JSON