Mid-term functional and quality of life outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: multicenter comparative matched-pair analyses release_lkq6wealzrbmxnmp63kylaiws4

by Kirsi Laitakari, J. K. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, J. Kössi, M. Kairaluoma, S. Koivurova, L. Pollari, P. Ohtonen, T. T. Rautio

Published in Techniques in Coloproctology by Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

2021   Volume 26, Issue 4, p253-260

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> The aim of this study was to compare patients' mid-term functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes following robotic ventral mesh rectopexy (RVMR) and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR). </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> The data of consecutive female patients who underwent minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for external or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse at 3 hospitals in Finland between January 2011 and December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Patients were matched by age and diagnosis at a 1:1 ratio. A disease-related symptom questionnaire was sent to all living patients at follow-up in July 2018. </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> After a total of 401 patients (RVMR, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 187; LVMR, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 214) were matched, 152 patients in each group were included in the final analyses. The median follow-up times were 3.3 (range 1.6–7.4) years and 3.0 (range 1.6–7.6) years for the RVMR and LVMR groups, respectively. The postoperative QoL measures did not differ between the groups. Compared with the LVMR group, the RVMR group had lower postoperative Wexner Incontinence Score (median 5 vs. median 8; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), experienced significant ongoing incontinence symptoms less often (30.6% vs. 49.0%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and reported less postoperative faecal incontinence discomfort evaluated with the visual analogue scale (median 11 vs. median 39; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.005). RVMR patients had a shorter hospital stay (2.2 days vs. 3.8 days; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) but experienced more frequent de novo pelvic pain (31.8% vs. 11.8%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> RVMR and LVMR patients had equal functional and QoL outcomes. Those who underwent RVMR had lower mid-term anal incontinence symptom scores but suffered more frequent de novo pelvic pain. </jats:sec>
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   595.5 kB
file_ga6fk7mqfbdqrie66k75wbz6jq
link.springer.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2021-12-21
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  1123-6337
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: ff75c650-5e35-4805-a242-06d6fa1e88f5
API URL: JSON