On the effect of anchoring on valuations when the anchor is transparently uninformative
release_l6lgajnlrzdjxeckkqfonz6hee
by
Konstantinos Ioannidis,
Theo Offerman,
Randolph Sloof
2020
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
We test whether anchoring affects people's elicited valuations for a bottle of wine in individual decision-making and in markets. We anchor subjects by asking them if they are willing to sell a bottle of wine for a transparently uninformative random price. We elicit subjects' Willingness-To-Accept for the bottle before and after the market. Subjects participate in a double auction market either in a small or a large trading group. The variance in subjects' Willingness-To-Accept shrinks within trading groups. Our evidence supports the idea that markets have the potential to diminish anchoring effects. However, the market is not needed: our anchoring manipulation failed in a large sample. In a concise meta-analysis, we identify the circumstances under which anchoring effects of preferences can be expected.
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf
1.5 MB
file_e5ybvlajxrh5vkau34mv7vbux4
|
link.springer.com (publisher) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
application/pdf
1.6 MB
file_doyxoo7ikrazlompgm5fpdt6rm
|
pure.uva.nl (web) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar