On the effect of anchoring on valuations when the anchor is transparently uninformative release_l6lgajnlrzdjxeckkqfonz6hee

by Konstantinos Ioannidis, Theo Offerman, Randolph Sloof

Published in Journal of the Economic Science Association by Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

2020  

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> We test whether anchoring affects people's elicited valuations for a bottle of wine in individual decision-making and in markets. We anchor subjects by asking them if they are willing to sell a bottle of wine for a transparently uninformative random price. We elicit subjects' Willingness-To-Accept for the bottle before and after the market. Subjects participate in a double auction market either in a small or a large trading group. The variance in subjects' Willingness-To-Accept shrinks within trading groups. Our evidence supports the idea that markets have the potential to diminish anchoring effects. However, the market is not needed: our anchoring manipulation failed in a large sample. In a concise meta-analysis, we identify the circumstances under which anchoring effects of preferences can be expected.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   1.5 MB
file_e5ybvlajxrh5vkau34mv7vbux4
link.springer.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
application/pdf   1.6 MB
file_doyxoo7ikrazlompgm5fpdt6rm
pure.uva.nl (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2020-09-22
Language   en ?
Journal Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  2199-6784
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 56ec9bb4-67c1-49b0-9545-32862f1f72cf
API URL: JSON