Penafsiran Riba Studi Komparatif Antara Kaum Modernis dan Neo-Revivalis release_krtpxozfujdvtnht34qi5bd64m

by A. Taufiq Buhari

Published in Syaikhuna by Koordinatorat Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Swasta Wilayah IV Surabaya.

2018   p231-248

Abstract

Interpretation of interest as applied to modern banking today, there are still differing views. Modernists view the prohibition of usury as being understood by emphasizing the rational aspect. Through this understanding, the element of injustice becomes a central issue for its prohibition. They seem to tolerate if their savings are based on the mudharabah system, because they can be found on the basis of their legitimacy. In addition, it is permissible if really forced (dharuri) or really needs (hajat). Also allows productive loan interest while consumptive loan interest is not allowed. While the Neo Revivalists were of the view that the prohibition of usury was understood legally formally as conceptualized in Islamic law. This view emphasizes the legal form of usury as expressed in Islamic law. They assert that the statement set out in the Qur'an must take its literal meaning, regardless of what was practiced in the pre-Islamic period. Whatever the circumstances, the lender does not have the right to receive additions to and exceed the principal
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   404.4 kB
file_usdqpeluivewjmoglefs6gjyui
ejournal.kopertais4.or.id (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2018-10-26
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
Not in DOAJ
Not in Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  2086-9088
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 842e7f41-6c29-4d21-b854-77f12dc132b7
API URL: JSON