Tolstoy's argument: realism and the history of science
release_klknmx4w55ev3d3d3drvszxfbe
by
Stathis Psillos
2018 p68
Abstract
In his intervention to the 'bankruptcy of science debate', which raged in Paris in the turn of the twentieth century, Leo Tolstoy was one of the first to use the past record of science as a weapon against current science. It is not inductive. It does not conclude that all current scientific theories will be abandoned; nor that most of them will be abandoned; not even that it is more likely than not that all or most of them will be abandoned. Its conclusion is modest: some of presently accepted theories will have the fate of those past theories that once dominated the scene but subsequently were abandoned.
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf
260.5 kB
file_dvdhteyj45egjkl7cyyfixhht4
|
philsci-archive.pitt.edu (repository) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
application/pdf
333.9 kB
file_s7mhsupl35hj7if2tjotnkd6lm
|
web.archive.org (webarchive) spontaneousgenerations.library.utoronto.ca (web) |
article-journal
Stage
published
Date 2018-02-15
Open Access Publication
Not in DOAJ
In ISSN ROAD
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:
1913-0465
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar