Obstacles to Studying Alternative Splicing Using scRNA-seq
release_iwf6uoi5dzc5jfl33y5cpkkueu
by
Anne Carla Ferguson-Smith,
Jennifer Westoby,
Pavel Artemov,
Martin Hemberg,
Apollo-University Of Cambridge Repository,
Apollo-University Of Cambridge Repository
2019
Abstract
Abstract Background: Early single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) studies suggested that it was unusual to see more than one isoform being produced from a gene in a single cell, even when multiple isoforms were detected in matched bulk RNA-seq samples. However, these studies generally did not consider the impact of dropouts or isoform quanti cation errors, potentially confounding the results of these analyses. Results: In this study, we take a simulation based approach in which we explicitly account for dropouts and isoform quanti cation errors. We use our simulations to ask to what extent it is possible to study alternative splicing using scRNA-seq. Additionally, we ask what limitations must be overcome to make splicing analysis feasible. We nd that the high rate of dropouts associated with scRNA-seq is a major obstacle to studying alternative splicing. In mice and other well established model organisms, the relatively low rate of isoform quanti cation errors poses a lesser obstacle to splicing analysis. We find that different models of isoform choice meaningfully change our simulation results. Conclusions: To accurately study alternative splicing with single-cell RNA-seq, a better understanding of isoform choice and the errors associated with scRNA-seq is required. An increase in the capture e ciency of scRNA-seq would also be beneficial. Until some or all of the above are achieved, we do not recommend attempting to resolve isoforms in individual cells using scRNA-seq.
In text/plain
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf
3.6 MB
file_4h7jk4ipqfcdtjot4ngsswfuda
|
www.biorxiv.org (repository) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
article-journal
Stage
published
Date 2019-10-11
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Datacite Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar