A Rotation in Contemporary Legal Scholarship
release_epaqc36srbd2dcl55fzxrza4ai
by
David Kennedy
Abstract
I develop my picture of contemporary legal scholarship in two broad strokes. In the first section, I focus on the relationship between legal scholarship and the traditions of theory, philosophy, and the human sciences, arguing that the interdisciplinary work of contemporary legal scholarship expresses legal culture's uneasiness about intellection. In the second section, I focus on the relationship between legal scholarship and political engagement, arguing that the programatic or exhortatory tone, structure and context of contemporary legal scholarship expresses legal culture's uneasiness about what it thinks of as "politics".
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf
345.7 kB
file_pn2emadbbncxhbl464tx7sckwu
| |
application/pdf
401.3 kB
file_cpnolukztzgchoe5lvibygj6oi
|
dash.harvard.edu (web) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar