Deficit Financing' or 'Deficit-Reduction Financing?' Debates in Contemporary Economics: Origins, Confusions and Clarity release_czu4edpcevbgvkjsptjrm3yztq

by Ann Pettifor Ann Pettifor

Published in journal of king Abdulaziz University Islamic Economics by King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publishing Centre.

2019   Volume 32, p67-78

Abstract

The analysis of government deficits and public debt points to a fundamental error in contemporary economic discussions. It is not possible to assess the stance of fiscal policy from estimates of the public sector deficit. John Maynard Keynes's macroeconomics and the empirical evidence discussed in this paper indicate that expansionary fiscal policy financed by loan issues will lead to growth in economic activity and employment. In an economy with spare capacity and idle resources, high government expenditure generates income, including tax revenues and thereby reduces the government deficit, and cuts public debt. The main purpose of increased loanfinanced government spending at times of private economic weakness is to increase the nation's income. Keynes argued that any such government spending was not deficit spending, because he understood the spending as the most sensible means to cut the deficit. Deficit-reduction spending might be a more appropriate definition, because as he argued with Josiah Stamp: "You will never balance the budget through measures which reduce national income" (Keynes, 1978, vol. 21, p. 149).
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   306.7 kB
file_5ew23wey3rcydeiqxmvetxe7ty
marz.kau.edu.sa (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2019-01-05
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: c1fc09c4-c9eb-464e-ab05-e2a407230a8a
API URL: JSON