Deficit Financing' or 'Deficit-Reduction Financing?'
Debates in Contemporary Economics: Origins, Confusions and Clarity
release_czu4edpcevbgvkjsptjrm3yztq
by
Ann Pettifor Ann Pettifor
2019 Volume 32, p67-78
Abstract
The analysis of government deficits and public debt points to a fundamental error in contemporary economic discussions. It is not possible to assess the
stance of fiscal policy from estimates of the public sector deficit. John Maynard
Keynes's macroeconomics and the empirical evidence discussed in this paper indicate
that expansionary fiscal policy financed by loan issues will lead to growth in economic
activity and employment. In an economy with spare capacity and idle resources, high
government expenditure generates income, including tax revenues and thereby reduces
the government deficit, and cuts public debt. The main purpose of increased loanfinanced government spending at times of private economic weakness is to increase
the nation's income. Keynes argued that any such government spending was not deficit
spending, because he understood the spending as the most sensible means to cut the
deficit. Deficit-reduction spending might be a more appropriate definition, because as
he argued with Josiah Stamp: "You will never balance the budget through measures
which reduce national income" (Keynes, 1978, vol. 21, p. 149).
In application/xml+jats
format
Archived Files and Locations
application/pdf
306.7 kB
file_5ew23wey3rcydeiqxmvetxe7ty
|
marz.kau.edu.sa (publisher) web.archive.org (webarchive) |
article-journal
Stage
published
Date 2019-01-05
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar