Effective control test at the interface between the law of international responsibility and the law of international organizations: Managing concerns over the attribution of UN peacekeepers' conduct to troop-contributing nations release_coqrvhorojaxniewfgh2ncvsdq

by Yohei Okada

Published in Leiden Journal of International Law by Cambridge University Press (CUP).

2019   p1-17

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> On 27 June 2017, in the <jats:italic>Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica</jats:italic> case, The Hague Court of Appeal applied the effective control test in determining attribution and found that the Netherlands was responsible for the failure of the Dutch battalion (Dutchbat) acting as a part of the UN Protection Force (UNPROFOR) to protect civilians from the Srebrenica massacre in 1995. This judgment is of considerable significance because the court renounced the preventive approach to the effective control test, to which the Dutch courts had repeatedly declared their adherence, and reverted to the traditional (presumptive) approach. The preventive interpretation was originally proposed with a view to justifying much broader attribution to troop-contributing nations (TCNs). However, quite interestingly, the Court of Appeal reached the conclusion that the Dutchbat's conduct was attributable to the Netherlands without recourse to the preventive approach. The present study argues that the legal framework for the attribution of UN peacekeepers' conduct has developed in such a manner that the fair allocation of responsibility and the effectiveness of UN peacekeeping operations are in equilibrium. In that sense, the effective control test should be located at the interface between the law of international responsibility and the law of international organizations. It is illustrated that not only does the preventive interpretation fail to strike a fair balance between the institutional considerations and the need to provide remedies for victims of peacekeepers' misconduct, but also the presumptive approach may lead to effective remedies while having due regard for the institutional considerations.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   259.6 kB
file_bjynz5ykfjcaxo6d2dx4ypchhy
application/pdf   260.5 kB
file_uro3i5ix6ngv7fluxvmilvpfmu
www.cambridge.org (web)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2019-02-25
Language   en ?
Journal Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0922-1565
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 1073c54f-a9a6-4a73-9659-eeba62509a1d
API URL: JSON