Forest transitions: a new conceptual scheme release_bkwti3o2hncuhkmo25hde5k3p4

by Christian A. Kull

Published in Geographica Helvetica by Copernicus GmbH.

2017   Volume 72, p465-474

Abstract

<strong>Abstract.</strong> <q>Forest transitions</q> have recently received much attention, particularly in the hope that the historical transitions from net deforestation to forest recovery documented in several temperate countries might be reproduced in tropical countries. The analysis of forest transitions, however, has struggled with questions of forest definition and has at times focussed purely on tree cover, irrespective of tree types (e.g. native forest or exotic plantations). Furthermore, it has paid little attention to how categories and definitions of forest are used to political effect or shape how forest change is viewed. In this paper, I propose a new heuristic model to address these lacunae, building on a conception of forests as distinct socio-ecological relationships between people, trees, and other actors that maintain and threaten the forest. The model draws on selected work in the forest transition, land change science, and critical social science literatures. It explicitly forces analysts to see forests as much more than a land cover statistic, particularly as it internalizes consideration of forest characteristics and the differential ways in which forests are produced and thought about. The new heuristic model distinguishes between four component forest transitions: transitions in quantitative forest cover (FT1); in characteristics like species composition or density (FT2); in the ecological, socio-economic, and political processes and relationships that constitute particular forests (FT3); and in forest ideologies, discourses, and stories (FT4). The four are interlinked; the third category emerges as the linchpin. An analysis of forest transformations requires attention to diverse social and ecological processes, to power-laden official categories and classifications, and to the discourses and tropes by which people interpret these changes. Diverse examples are used to illustrate the model components and highlight the utility of considering the four categories of forest transitions.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   316.2 kB
file_4qlnkjxgzbbt3pyxauqv73xn5i
web.archive.org (webarchive)
serval.unil.ch (web)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2017-12-15
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Open Access Publication
In DOAJ
In ISSN ROAD
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0016-7312
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 08eae971-a4b8-4f8c-a88e-9c9e1ca5571f
API URL: JSON