(Im)possible Traces release_bgv3svcmvbgnhk3pw6qkklw7te

by Ethan Poole

Published in Linguistic Inquiry by MIT Press - Journals.

2022   p1-68

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> This paper argues that when movement maps onto a λ-bound variable (a 'trace'), that variable must be of an individual semantic type, e.g. type e and type d. Thus, even though natural language has expressions of higher types, these expressions cannot be represented as traces. When an individual-type trace would not be able to semantically compose in the launching site of movement, the moved element is forced to syntactically reconstruct. The motivation for this constraint on traces comes from a detailed investigation of how DPs in their different semantic guises—entities, properties, and generalized quantifiers—are interpreted when they move. I then argue that strong definite descriptions exhibit the same type-based restriction, namely they cannot occur in higher-type positions, which I take as evidence for the theory that traces are definite descriptions.
In application/xml+jats format

Archived Files and Locations

application/pdf   7.8 MB
file_n3aa4pwdjjgndezivv4ju7dwha
watermark.silverchair.com (publisher)
web.archive.org (webarchive)
Read Archived PDF
Preserved and Accessible
Type  article-journal
Stage   published
Date   2022-03-28
Language   en ?
Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
In Keepers Registry
ISSN-L:  0024-3892
Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)
Catalog Record
Revision: 75eb1762-0a99-4500-95da-f415e95d8c17
API URL: JSON