Robbing a Barren Vault: The Implications of Dukes v. Wal-Mart for Cases Challenging Subjective Employment Practices

by Elizabeth Chika Tippett

Published in Social Science Research Network by Elsevier BV.

2012

application/pdf 637.0 kB `file_ufibsnxfmzb33cyjrjldn2ib3a`
application/pdf 3.1 MB `file_hyw52f5gl5ez7c7gaxvbbte7am`	scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu (web) web.archive.org (webarchive)

Preserved and Accessible

Type article-journal
Stage

published

Year 2012
Language en ^?

DOI 10.2139/ssrn.1995238

Container Metadata
Not in DOAJ
Not in Keepers Registry
ISSN-L: 1556-5068

Work Entity
access all versions, variants, and formats of this works (eg, pre-prints)

Cite This

BibTeX
CSL-JSON
MLA
Harvard

Lookup Links

oaDOI/unpaywall (OA fulltext)
Crossref Metadata (via API)
Worldcat
SHERPA/RoMEO (journal policies)
wikidata.org
CORE.ac.uk
Semantic Scholar
Google Scholar

Catalog Record
Revision: 4b9b45a1-319d-489b-966b-026e0a82389e
API URL: JSON

Robbing a Barren Vault: The Implications of Dukes v. Wal-Mart for Cases Challenging Subjective Employment Practices release_arw2omf655ctteejtvlpqu74ya